🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.